Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
On 30 September, an accelerated misconduct hearing concluded PC Mukaram Zaman breached standards of professional behaviour in relation to discreditable conduct, but not gross misconduct.
A hearing, convened in line with Police Regulations and heard by the City of London Police Commissioner, concluded the case be returned to the Appropriate Authority (Professional Standards) and dealt with in accordance with Part 4 of the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020.
The allegation related to an arrest for domestic related offences made prior to PC Zaman becoming a police officer, which resulted in no further action. The officer had been named as a respondent in a non-molestation order and the allegation of misconducted related to this not being properly declared.
Detective Superintendent Tom Hill, Head of Professional Standards , said:
“The misconduct hearing, which was convened in line with Police Regulations, found the officer’s conduct did not amount to gross misconduct, but was proven as discreditable conduct.
“The officer remains suspended from his duties and the case will now progress to a misconduct meeting, in line with Police Regulations, after which he will be subject to a vetting review .”